We just work with the best actors
“We just work with the best actors
– diversity doesn’t come into it”
But what does “best” actually mean? And does one person’s idea of “best” correlate with another’s? Possibly not.
There are certain key technical skills anyone would probably agree actors need to have. Beyond that we get into the terrain of taste, which is tricky, because taste is subjective. It’s also open to being unhelpfully swayed by our unconscious bias as well as our conscious bias or prejudices.
It is easy for any group of people that dominate power, resources and decision-making to dictate what is considered “good taste” or the “best”. That’s not because they alone possess the ability to detect excellence, but because their platform enables them to have a loud voice – and (often unintentionally) drown out other people’s different but equally valid opinions.
We only need to watch movies and recordings of theatrical productions from previous eras to see that what is considered “good” acting is a movable feast, influenced by shifting fashions and sensibilities. There is no universal, timeless definition of what “good” acting is or looks like.
Any of us involved in the casting process should go into it with an open mind and readiness to experience a different type of “good” or “best” we haven’t previously encountered – rather than an anxiety about finding something that replicates what we’ve already encountered or decided we want.